1029.8.19.3. Notwithstanding section 1029.8.19.2, a taxpayer may be deemed to have paid an amount to the Minister under section 1029.7 or 1029.8, in respect of the portion of a consideration referred to in subparagraph c or g of the first paragraph of each of those sections, or under any of sections 1029.8.6, 1029.8.7, 1029.8.10, 1029.8.11, 1029.8.16.1.4 and 1029.8.16.1.5, in respect of a project referred to in the first paragraph of that section 1029.8.19.2 in which the scientific research and experimental development is undertaken, in whole or in part, on behalf of the taxpayer or the partnership of which the taxpayer is a member, by another person or partnership if, were it not for section 1029.8.19.2, an amount would have been deemed to have been paid to the Minister under section 1029.7 or 1029.8, in respect of the portion of a consideration referred to in subparagraph c or g of the first paragraph of that section, or under any of sections 1029.8.6, 1029.8.7, 1029.8.10, 1029.8.11, 1029.8.16.1.4 and 1029.8.16.1.5 and if each contribution referred to in the first paragraph of that section 1029.8.19.2, in respect of the project or the carrying out thereof, constitutes an expenditure made by the other person or partnership or, where subparagraph g of the first paragraph of section 1029.7 or 1029.8 applies, by the other person or partnership referred to in that subparagraph, to undertake, in whole or in part, the scientific research and experimental development.
Notwithstanding section 1029.8.19.2, a taxpayer may be deemed to have paid an amount to the Minister under section 1029.7 or 1029.8, in respect of the portion of a consideration referred to in subparagraph e or i of the first paragraph of each of those sections, under a contract referred to in the second paragraph of that section 1029.8.19.2 in which the work relating to scientific research and experimental development is undertaken, in whole or in part, on behalf of the taxpayer or the partnership of which the taxpayer is a member, by another person or partnership if, were it not for section 1029.8.19.2, an amount would have been deemed to have been paid to the Minister under section 1029.7 or 1029.8, in respect of the portion of a consideration referred to in subparagraph e or i of the first paragraph of that section and if each contribution referred to in the second paragraph of that section 1029.8.19.2, in respect of the contract or the performance of the contract, constitutes an expenditure made by the other person or partnership or, where subparagraph i of the first paragraph of section 1029.7 or 1029.8 applies, by the other person or partnership referred to in that subparagraph, to undertake, in whole or in part, that work.
Where the first or second paragraph applies to a taxpayer, the amount deemed to have been paid to the Minister, under section 1029.7 or 1029.8, in respect of the portion of a consideration referred to in subparagraph c, e, g or i of the first paragraph of that section, or under any of sections 1029.8.6, 1029.8.7, 1029.8.10, 1029.8.11, 1029.8.16.1.4 and 1029.8.16.1.5, shall be determined only on the portion of the qualified expenditure in respect of which an amount was otherwise deemed to have been paid to the Minister under that section 1029.7 or 1029.8 in respect of the portion of the consideration referred to in subparagraph c, e, g or i of the first paragraph of that section, or under any of sections 1029.8.6, 1029.8.7, 1029.8.10, 1029.8.11, 1029.8.16.1.4 and 1029.8.16.1.5, reduced by the amount of a contribution referred to in the first paragraph of section 1029.8.19.2 in respect of the project or the carrying out thereof or in the second paragraph of that section in respect of the contract or the performance thereof, as the case may be.
1993, c. 19, s. 108; 1993, c. 64, s. 155; 1995, c. 1, s. 143; 1995, c. 63, s. 149; 1995, c. 63, s. 535; 1997, c. 14, s. 207; 1999, c. 83, s. 172; 2007, c. 12, s. 136.